When you look at the section that is first of paper, make a case for your new research.

When you look at the section that is first of paper, make a case for your new research.

Reveal to your reader why you made a decision to research this topic, problem, or issue, and just why such research is needed. Explain any “gaps” in the current research on this topic, and explain how your quest plays a role in closing that gap.

While not always required, the literature review may be an part that is important of introduction. An overview is provided by it of relevant research in your discipline. Its goal would be to provide a scholarly context for your quest question, and explain how your very own research fits into that context. A literature review is certainly not merely a listing of the sources you’ve found for your paper—it should synthesize the details gathered from those sources in order to demonstrate that work still needs to be done.

Explain your selection criteria early on—why do you choose each of your sources? The literature review should only relate to work that affects your specific question. Seek out a diverse number of sources. Look at primary-research reports and data sets along with secondary or sources that are analytical.

This section should explain the way you collected and evaluated important computer data. Make use of the past tense, and make use of precise language. Explain why you chose your methods and how they compare into the standard practices in your discipline. Continue reading “When you look at the section that is first of paper, make a case for your new research.”